The assessment answered whether AI has value here — the program doesn’t re-ask. It answers how: the transformation itself, prioritized initiative by initiative — in writing, with the reasoning.
Which initiatives launch first?
Which wait — and which shouldn’t run at all?
What happens in the first 90 days?
What does the 12–24 month roadmap look like?
What must be fixed before the first launch?
Who owns AI in the company?
Which direction fits — Cloud, Hybrid, Private or Sovereign AI — and why?
What will it take — the range, the main cost lines, the financing models, the payback horizon?
One package — the AI Transformation Program: five documents and the executive recommendation, opened by an executive summary for the CEO, CTO and the board. The AI Adoption Program is the engagement; this package is what it hands over.
The opportunities from your assessment, worked into a prioritized portfolio of transformation initiatives: the process each one changes, expected effect, complexity, indicative ROI, and its place in the sequence — including what comes later and what shouldn’t run at all.
The implementation sequence in phases — from the first 90 days to the 24-month horizon, each phase with its entry conditions and first moves.
Transformation prerequisites — what to close before the first launch: structure the documents, clean the data, define data owners, roll out SSO, stand up an AI Governance Committee, name who answers for AI.
A direction, not an infrastructure design: Cloud AI / Hybrid AI / Private AI / Sovereign AI — with the why.
The investment range, main cost lines, possible financing models, indicative payback horizon. No GPU sizing and no detailed TCO — deliberately.
A call on each initiative — launch now, a later phase, or drop. Not the company-level go/no-go: that was the assessment’s job. Sample — form, not real data.
Our team takes your AI Adoption Assessment as the input and develops the transformation portfolio, the recommendations and the roadmap.
Phases 1–2 are the Assessment — the same method, continued.
A working session with your leadership: the assessment results, the Transformation Portfolio, the Roadmap and the Executive Recommendation — on the table. Questions are discussed; recommendations are adjusted where needed.
The program is priced from $30,000 — visible on purpose. What stands behind it:
No assessment yet? Start there — the program is built on it: AI Adoption Assessment →
For each initiative the roadmap greenlights, the AI Solution Blueprint turns direction into a technical & functional specification — detailed enough to hand straight to a delivery team, yours or ours.
About the AI Solution Blueprint →Start with a 30-minute scoping call — or go straight to a one-page proposal.
Yes — by design. The assessment is where the information intake happens: the interviews, the environment descriptions, the verified readiness profile, the opportunity map. The program works from that evidence; without it we’d be planning on assumptions — exactly what this track exists to prevent. No assessment yet? Start there, or take the full track: Assessment + Program from $48,000 — one proposal, one team.
It’s a sequence with phases and entry conditions, not a promise of dates. Each phase starts when its prerequisites are closed — the Gap Analysis lists them explicitly.
The conflict is on the table: Haink builds software and supplies hardware. The architecture recommendation is a direction with the reasoning attached — and Cloud AI is a real recommendation we ship when it fits. The program has to survive your board, not our sales targets.
That’s what the Executive Review is for — a working session, not a presentation. Questions get discussed, recommendations get adjusted where the argument is better than ours.
They are high-level estimates, and the documents say so openly. You get an investment range, the main cost lines and an indicative payback horizon — enough to compare initiatives and decide what to launch and in what order. It is not a budget: exact figures appear at the next level, when an initiative gets its technical blueprint.
Almost none beyond the Executive Review session — the analysis runs on the assessment materials. Expect one working session with leadership plus a review cycle on the documents.
Execution. The documents are written so a competent team can execute them — yours or anyone’s. If you continue with us, each initiative gets its technical blueprint and moves into delivery: software, infrastructure, supply.